Tag Archives: liposuction


Permalink to Plastic Surgery Timeline – When Will I Heal By?

Plastic Surgery Timeline – When Will I Heal By?

In plastic surgery, often one of the biggest questions patients will ask me is,”how long will I be down after this procedure?” Of course, this depends on the surgery and partially on an individual basis although for the most part, it is pretty predictable.

I recently found a little straight-forward article by a husband and wife plastic surgery team out in Columbus Ohio who summed it all up very nicely. Drs. Christine and Michael Sullivan of The Sullivan Centre are certified plastic surgeons and this is what they wrote:

Breast Augmentation or Liposuction (Including SmartLipo TriPlex)
To be ready by New Year’s, have surgery by December 1.To be ready by Valentine’s Day, have surgery by January 14.To be ready for Graduation, have surgery by April 20.To be ready by Independence Day, have surgery by June 4.To be ready by Labor Day, have surgery by August 1.To be ready by Thanksgiving, have surgery by October 22.To be ready by Christmas, have surgery by November 25.
Facelift or Rhinoplasty
To be ready by New Year’s, have surgery by September 1.To be ready by Valentine’s Day, have surgery by October 14.To be ready for Graduation, have surgery by January 20.To be ready by Independence Day, have surgery by March 4.To be ready by Labor Day, have surgery by May 1.To be ready by Thanksgiving, have surgery by July 22.To be ready by Christmas, have surgery by August 25.
Tummy Tuck or Breast Lift
To be ready by New Year’s, have surgery by November 15.To be ready by Valentine’s Day, have surgery by December 31.To be ready for Graduation, have surgery by March 5.To be ready by Independence Day, have surgery by May 15.To be ready by Labor Day, have surgery by July 15.To be ready by Thanksgiving, have surgery by October 7.To be ready by Christmas, have surgery by November 10.
I found this to be very accurate and helpful! Good job, Drs. Sullivan!

About The Sullivan Centre: The Sullivan Centre, co-founded by Drs. Christine and Michael Sullivan, is the first free-standing ambulatory surgical center dedicated to cosmetic surgery in central Ohio. It is located at 97706 Olentangy River Road in Columbus, Ohio 43235. Reach them at sullivancentre.com or by phone at 614-436-8888.


Permalink to SmartLipo TriPlex: A Better Mousetrap

SmartLipo TriPlex: A Better Mousetrap

The SmartLipo TriPlex is the 5th generation of SmartLipo and is exclusively offered in Northern California by Dr. Andrew Kaczynski at Advanced Concepts in Plastic Surgery.

The SmartLipo TriPlex is the 5th generation of SmartLipo and is exclusively offered in Northern California by Dr. Andrew Kaczynski at Advanced Concepts in Plastic Surgery.

SmartLipo is a brand name for a laser assisted liposuction technology developed and manufactured by Cynosure in Europe. SmartLipo TriPlex is the lastest, 5th generation of the SmartLipo brand. After more than six years of Cynosure trying to sell me the SmartLipo technology, after consideration of all the data, I have determined that the SmartLipo TriPlex is indeed a better mousetrap. I am now the only certified plastic surgeon in Northern California to offer this better and safer SmartLipo TriPlex liposuction technology. Liposculpture with the SmartLipo Triplex has proven to be even more effective, with better results than I had even hoped for! If you are researching SmartLipo or liposuction techniques, make sure you ask any doctor you speak to which generation of SmartLipo they are offering and if their laser lipo technology has a temperature monitor auto shut-off.

I have been performing liposuction since it was invented by Dr. Illouz in the 1980s. During all those years, different Liposuction methods emerged, such as Tumescence, Superficial, Power-assisted, Ultrasonic (VASER) and Laser Liposuction. Initially Laser Liposuction was experimental and not very practical. As the machines got better so did the results. However, it was still time-consuming, potentially dangerous because of burns due to lack of temperature control, and results were not noticeably different from previous, and I believed, safeer methods.

The ideal liposuction treatment would involve the smallest incisions, remove large amounts of fat, have minimal bruising, rapid healing, and would shrink the skin in the areas where fat is removed. It would also be safe and consistent . For years, the method closest to this standard was Ultrasonic Liposuction, or the VASER. At the time, there were many different Laser Liposuction systems such as and they all claimed to be the best. However, they were still time-consuming and had the risk of burning due to the lack of control over the lasers energy. That is, until Cynosure came out with SmartLipo TriPlex.

The current generation of Smart Lipo is the fifth generation of Cynosure’s technology. It provides three different laser wavelengths(1064, 1320 and 1440). This does make the system more complex, but much more effective: One wavelength decreases bruising, one increases fat melting, and one increases skin tightening. The biggest change as far as results are concerned, is the fact that there is significant additional skin shrinkage compared to previous systems. This is especially important in problem areas like arms, neck, inner-thighs, and abdomen.

SmartLipo now also leads to less trauma and faster healing. Equally important is the fact that this system has a temperature guide. In the past, the surgeon had to either feel the skin, or use a temperature gun to check the outside temperature. This new system has an internal temperature control which is an important safeguard to prevent excessive heating and the possibility of thermal damage.

The Smart Lipo Triplex machine is the next big thing in body contouring in terms of fat removal, skin tightening, and safety.


Permalink to Breasts, Fat, Wired & Cytori

Breasts, Fat, Wired & Cytori

Breast augmenation fat graftingI love Wired magazine. It gives me a window onto the high-tech electronics world, that being in a biologically based profession I might otherwise be disconnected with. So it’s rather exciting when they feature a story about something that I actually do know something about. And when it’s a cover story, well, that’s even better! So I was definitely interested in reading their most recent cover story “Natural Breasts.” Of course, for the magazine it’s a great title because it allows for the rationale to make the cover photo a close-up of a woman’s cleavage which is probably good for a little spike in sales to their predominantly male (and perhaps nerdy) readership.

What is Wired referring to when they refer to “natural breasts?” The story talks about the renewed interest in fat grafting as an option for breast augmentation. Fat grafting for breast augmentation means plumping up a woman’s breasts with her own fat that is transferred from another part of her body rather than using silicone or saline breast implants. Just the other day I posted a press release that highlighted a recent study I took part in that showed the VASER liposuction system is ideal for this very purpose. Essentially, the story is the tale of a bio-tech start-up company called Cytori. This company is getting into the tissue engineering business via stem cells harvested from fat and are doing so by starting with breast augmentation.

Why breasts? Theoretically they are simple to build since they consist of only one type of tissue which is fat. Nobody’s talking about actually building mammary glands that secrete milk. It’s all about form and not function. Attempts were made beginning in 1980s to do augmentation with fat. They had mixed results, mostly due to the fat not surviving and just being absorbed by the body. There were many different techniques and many different technologies applied.

This new story begins with a UCLA plastic surgeon Mark Hedrick who wondered if fat had stem cells. In fact it does. Approximate one stem cell per 100 fat cells versus one per 250,000 to 400,000 in bone marrow. Stem cells are the darlings of cell biology. Theoretically they can be used to make any tissue. They also release substances which improve healing and regeneration. Cytori reasoned that if you separated stem cells from the fat, purify them and added them as a concentrated extract to more fat than the combined stem cell plus fat graft would take better. They ran two successful trials in Japan. One on reconstructing partial mastectomy another on breast augmentation. I actually have the opportunity to hear the investigator Dr. Karushima present his work. He successfully implanted approximately 100 mL per breast for an increase of 1.6 cupsizes his Japanese patients.

The rest of the article talks about the potential for these stem cells including heart and other organs. So is this the next big thing? Well it certainly could be for the hard if their studies continue to pan out.

Why isn’t this a done deal? There are many questions with respect to breast augmentation with fat grafting. The following are just a few:

  1. The results are not significantly different than non-stem cell fat grafting to the breast. I’ve done in the past on selected patients with good results. Dr. Coleman in New York and Dr. Khouri in Florida have achieved excellent results without stem cells. To date I don’t know of any study comparing stem cell fat grafting with non-stem cell fat grafting.
  2. Caution needs to be used for the mastectomy reconstructions. In animal studies stem cells can potentiate cancer growth. Now there has already been a lot of work with fat grafting to breast cancer reconstruction. No problems have been reported. However is there a critical mass of stem cells that might cause a cancer recurrence?
  3. What are the comparative costs going to be? Taking time to remove enough that can be a long procedure, adding to anesthesia expenses and increasing patient risk. As long as we’re taking out these cells and manipulating them why not have an ideal scenario where you take out 10 CC a fat in the office under local and grow to 1000 CC in the lab and then inject?
  4. Who will be doing this? Anybody they can buy cytoris stem cell machine? Building a breast is an art as well as a science we’ve already seen the problems when non-core physicians, that is, family practitioners and gynecologists get into the plastic surgery profession.
  5. There is currently a limit on how much fat can be put in. This is related to the skin tightness and pressure which kills fat grafts themselves when too much is put in. Dr. Khouri has solved this problem for now with skin expansion using the Brava bra but this is time-consuming and burdensome. If the cells are augmented with the Cytori stem cell technique can this be avoided?

So are stem cells really the answer to natural breast augmentation? Cytori is certainly betting a lot of money that it is. Hopefully their studies will show that stem cells and fat grafts will create an easy breast augmentation with minimal downtime and no future complications that is superior to current techniques. If not someone else will eventually come up with the answer. Tissue engineering is already here. It’s just not perfected. So stay tuned it’s going to be a wild ride!


Permalink to New Study Supports VASER® Ultrasound Assisted Liposuction As Ideal Tool for Fat Transfer

New Study Supports VASER® Ultrasound Assisted Liposuction As Ideal Tool for Fat Transfer

- Press Release-

Research Reveals VASER Lipo® Yields Fat as Viable As Conventional Liposuction

LOUISVILLE, CO – According to a recent study conducted at the University of Pittsburgh, human fat harvested by VASER ultrasound-assisted liposuction (Sound Surgical Technologies LLC), is as viable as fat collected by conventional suction assisted liposuction, with nearly 80% volume retention.

The study, led by Dr. J. Peter Rubin, Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at the University of Pittsburgh, is the first research to establish strong support for VASER Lipo as a collection method of choice for fat transfer procedures.

The study investigated tissue samples of a female subject who underwent lipoplasty of the thighs and flanks. Detailed cellular viability analysis was performed on tissues collected, each having undergone VASER Lipo and suction-assisted liposuction on the body area. The researchers found little or no difference at the cellular level between the treatments, concluding that VASER Lipo is just as effective in yielding viable fat cells as suction-assisted liposuction devices. Results at six weeks showed approximately 80% of the filtered fat survived by volume, regardless of the method of extraction. As a point of comparison, other studies have shown less than 5% of the water-jet assisted liposuction fat survived.

“The highly selective nature of ultrasound energy promotes increased fat viability, making it ideal for fat transfer procedures,” said Mark Schafer, Chief Technology Officer at Sound Surgical Technologies. “We believe this important research will pave the way for widespread adoption of VASER ultrasound-assisted liposuction as the preferred method for fat transfer.”

The study’s findings support recent physician feedback that the VASER Lipo System is the leading technology for fat harvesting and fat transfer procedures, with unrivaled body sculpting capabilities.

About VASER Lipo

The VASER Lipo System features gentle ultrasonic energy that uses sound waves to selectively target unwanted fat.  The FDA-cleared device uses small probes that emit ultrasound energy to gently break apart fatty tissue for easy removal without destroying the fat cells themselves.  This means physicians can immediately remove, harvest and re-inject the fat to contour and augment other parts of the body, including the face, hands, breasts and buttocks.  The VASER Lipo System, one of the most respected body contouring technologies on the market, is the cosmetic enhancement tool of choice among top physicians who have patients who want both of these procedures in one appointment.

About Sound Surgical Technologies

Founded in 1998, Sound Surgical Technologies is a leading manufacturer and distributor of ultrasonic body shaping technologies, including the VASER Lipo which effectively treats all areas of the body and is clinically proven to enhance skin retraction, reduce blood loss, and maintain the viability of fat cells for fat grafting procedures. Physicians report smooth and consistent results with fast patient recovery. The VASER Shape MC1 and MedSculpt Systemsare an ideal complement to VASER Lipo, combining ultrasound and massage therapies to increase lymphatic and venous circulation, minimize postoperative pain and swelling, and temporarily improve the appearance of cellulite. All of the devices are FDA-cleared for use in the U.S. To learn more, visit www.vaser.com.

Dr. Andrew Kaczynski took part in this study and is proud to offer VASER Lipo at Advanced Concepts in Plastic Surgery in Sacramento.


Permalink to Bridalplasty – Brides Compete for Extreme Plastic Surgery

Bridalplasty – Brides Compete for Extreme Plastic Surgery

BridalplastyJust when you thought our TV entertainment culture had hit rock bottom, some network executive somewhere comes up with yet another lower level of low! Bridalplasty is that new low. Bridalplasty is a new reality TV show soon to be offered by E! that will show soon to be brides competing in various ways in an attempt to win extreme plastic surgery. I don’t even know where to begin in regard to the obnoxious lack of ethics on every level that this sad excuse for entertainment brings up. Celebrity surgeon Terry Dubrow, who will be performing the surgeries on Bridalplasty, really needs to rethink this.

Part of the Bridalplasty’s concept includes the bride first showing her results to the groom at the “unveiling” during the actual wedding ceremony.

“Viewers will witness his emotional and possibly shocked reaction as they stand at the altar and he lifts her veil to see her for the first time following her extreme plastic surgery,” says E!, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

This, of course just takes the whole idea of the groom not seeing the bride in her wedding dress until the ceremony to a whole new level. A nose job, breast augmentation, lip augmentation and some liposuction and he may not even recognize her! That shouldn’t make an intimidating moment any more difficult, should it? Unfortunately, this is what the network and potentially, the audience,  is after. They are selling the shock of emotional vulnerability.

This concept trivializes plastic surgery, important life decisions, and it makes a mockery of the institution of marriage. It is beyond sad how far entertainment corporations, audiences and participants are willing to go in search of money and the cheap emotional thrills.

Surgery, whether it is cosmetic or otherwise is a serious life and death issue, (although I have personally never lost a patient during cosmetic surgery in 28+ years). Surgery is not entertainment and marriage is not trivial. The very concept of the TV show Bridalplasty trivializes both and knocks our culture down a few more notches in the ranks of civilized societies.


Permalink to Cher – Plastic Surgery & The VMA’s

Cher – Plastic Surgery & The VMA’s

CHER- Video Music Awards 2010 - VMAs with Lady Gaga

CHER at the 2010 Video Music Awards "VMA's"

Cher presented Lady Gaga with the Video Music Award for Video of the Year Award last night at the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards. When Cher first walked out wearing a similar or the same outfit she wore for her 1980′s video, “If I Could Turn Back Time,” you could almost hear a collective, “wow,” as the entire country watching realized she is now in her 60′s! Indeed, Cher is 64 years old and looks, even on my high definition T.V., like she’s in her early 40′s. Is plastic surgery the secret? Actually, no… as in, “no, it isn’t a secret.” Cher takes care of herself, but she also has been very open about her use of plastic surgery to maintain her looks.  Make Me Heal reports, “Cher has had a breast augmentation, rhinoplasty (nose job), blepharoplasty (eyelid surgery), and possibly many others including enhancing the appearance of her teeth, liposuction, and a facelift. Although speculation revolved around Cher getting cheek implants, a tummy tuck, and a rib removed, she has completely denied the truth in those rumors. However, Cher openly admits she has become “the plastic surgery poster girl”.

The great thing about Cher is that she doesn’t expect anyone to not realize how old she is, she’s been a celebrity since the mid 1960s! Instead, she’s realistic about her age and the fact that time and gravity tend to be harsh on us all. But this is where great plastic surgery can work. Of course, when we look at Cher we think, “wow, she must have had a lot of work done.” But we don’t think, “YIKES!” like we do with some of the really bad celebrity plastic surgery we are all familiar with. To me, She looks great. She looks like she’s had very talented plastic surgeons and beyond that, she also obviously listened to their recommendations. I’m sure a lot of those scary celebrity plastic surgery cases are more a result of the celebrity insisting on procedures than doctors may have recommended against. At 64, Cher is an example of plastic surgery as an art.

What did/do you think of Cher’s plastic surgery and her overall look? Please weigh in below!


Permalink to Heidi Montag Lessons

Heidi Montag Lessons

Heidi Montag Breast Augmentation

Heidi Montag's Breasts Are Too Big!

Some stories just won’t go away. The Heidi Montag saga seemed like just another fifteen minutes of fame for a desperate starlet. And it makes for a great story: D-list celebrity trying to get an edge with an extreme makeover that will catapult her to stardom… or not.

But now, after the initial stories cataloging her surgeries mini brow lift, nose revision, facial and buttock fat grafts, breast implant revision, ear pinning, neck liposuction, the stories continue. She’s in pain. She’s happy. She’s not happy. She wants bigger implants. She’s going outside the U.S. for implants she can’t buy in the U.S., and the stories just continue on and on, probably fed by her publicist.

Since Heidi Montag and her drama are not going away anytime soon, what can we all learn from this modern-day tale of transformation that will help us in our thinking about plastic surgery?

If you are considering plastic surgery, it is important to be realistic about what you are considering and why.  Number one, if you don’t want to set yourself up for disappointment the only reason you should have plastic surgery is for yourself.  No one should be considering plastic surgery because someone else is telling you to.  Plastic surgery should not be undertaken to get or keep a husband or boyfriend, nor to get a specific job. The procedure, and your new image, should be its own reward. It should give you a positive self-image and give you more confidence. To expect secondary gain is setting yourself up for disappointment. The exception to this rule may be a situation where someone is looking prematurely old and seeks facial surgery for better competitiveness in the job market. Heidi Montag is not prematurely old.

Less is more–rule one: I don’t know exactly how long Heidi’s ten procedures took, but I try to limit my procedures to less than six hours. The medical standard for safe elective surgery is less than six hours. This means that after six hours the risk of medical complications rises. It is also more difficult to recover when you can’t get in a comfortable position because of the pain resulting from your multiple procedures. Performing fewer procedures in two operations makes for two shorter, safer operations with quicker recovery time, as opposed to one long one with a much longer and more uncomfortable recovery.

Less is more–rule two: As you age you should only have the minimum amount of work done to correct the problems. There is no such thing as prophylactic facelifts, although some people claim to do them. I’m okay with the chin and nose changes. But the brow lift and fat grafts actually made her look older boring here and harsher. Nothing can replace the freshness of youth and once it’s gone it’s gone.

Less is more—rule three: And important thing to remember about breast augmentation is that breasts can be too big! The only kind of movie Heidi Montag’s new breasts will get her into is the kind with three X’s, rather than snagging Meghan Fox’s roll in Transformers 3! I’ve put in large implants, even the maximum size, 800cc, but these are cases where the woman could handle them because of her height and the size of her chest. If Heidi wants to go bigger than her current 700cc implants, in order to really see a difference she would need to go to 1000cc which is way too much for anyone, much less a thin woman who is 5’2.

The downside of really big implants: Bigger scars to put them in for silicone implants. Putting in 1000cc  saline implants would be a nightmare. They would come down to her knees in no time.

What goes up must come down. Implants that large would have minimal muscle support. There is no breast lift that would lift them up for any significant length of time. She will have to downsize in order to have a successful breast lift.

Implants that big would make her skin tissues paper thin over time. Wrinkles and ripples would be visible.

Implants that large would actually pull down on her shoulders and neck. They would likely cause severe back pain. Most women who naturally have breasts that size eventually come in for breast reduction.

Just because a surgery can be done, doesn’t necessarily mean it should be done. She’s not yet in the ranks of plastic surgery monsters but if she keeps this up, there is little doubt she will be listed on one of many scary plastic surgery Websites.  Good plastic surgery is designed to makes people look like themselves and doesn’t make you look like a different species. Is she on her way? Only time will tell.


Permalink to Facelift By OBGYN?

Facelift By OBGYN?

With the current wave of “Alice in Wonderland” mania, a recent email from a friend reminded me of a scene in that classic book.  In that scene, Alice is talking to the caterpillar and he keeps asking her, “who are you?” This reminder, in my mind, led to my impressions of a current phenomenon I’ve been seeing and reading about lately regarding the business of plastic surgery. It occurred to me that it seemed apropos to ask any doctor, offering plastic surgery, that very same question. This is because the answer to that question can be very vague.

There is a disturbing trend in medicine where internists, family doctors, gynecologists and other specialists are offering to do plastic surgery procedures as a way of making a little cash, “on the side.”  Dermatologists and E.N.T. (ear, nose & throat) doctors are expanding into areas where they have little or no training.  Because of this, complications are escalating like never before.

I know someone who went in for a yearly checkup and found her internists now owned a roomful of lasers next-door and was promoting their use.  The largest liposuction clinic in my community is run by an internists and an emergency room doctor.  Family practice doctors are opening, “med spas.”   Some E.N.T. doctors are beginning to perform breast augmentation surgery and gynecologists are doing face-lifts. What’s going on?

A recent article in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery by Matthew Camp, titled Who is Providing Aesthetic Surgery? A detailed examination of the geographic distribution and training backgrounds of cosmetic practitioners in Southern California put some insight into this question.

So what is going on?

Medicine is hard-pressed for fair reimbursement by health insurance companies.  Despite any statements to the contrary, it is likely going to get worse in the future.  More and more doctors will be attempting to supplement their income by offering plastic surgery procedures in which they have little or no training.

Plastic surgery is literally the only cash business left in medicine, especially if you include hair transplants, laser hair removal, varicose veins, and all noninvasive treatments under that umbrella.

Individual magazines devoted to different specialties routinely promote, “boosting your income by adding cosmetic services.”  Medical meetings also promote one-day workshops in different procedures and technologies.

Makers of cosmetic products and devices are actively promoting their goods to non-plastic surgeons as a way of expanding their markets.  Moreover, those that are not intentionally marketing to these doctors are none-the-less bound by law to sell to these doctors if the doctor orders from them.  This is because in California, a medical doctor has a license that entitles him or her to do anything they see medically fit in the office.  He can do brain surgery, heart surgery, or sex changes.  If something goes wrong, let the lawyers sort it out after the fact.  There is no restraint of trade for physicians.  Hospitals monitor doctors and only allow them to have privileges for those procedures in which they have actual training and/or certification.  This is why most of these practitioners who are expanding their offerings work only in their offices where they are completely unsupervised and unregulated.

The economic situation that is leading gynecologists to start offering facelifts is also placing very young plastic surgeons, just out of school, in a difficult situation.  Therefore, they are vulnerable to being scooped up by franchise corporations that have catchy names and usually offer one specialty procedure at what they suggest is a discount price that an established and experienced plastic surgeon cannot compete with. The reality is that in most cases they are at or very near regular market prices for these procedures.  These “McFacelift” shops or “LipoKing” franchises perform procedures with pressure on the doctors and staff to do as many per day and as fast as they possibly can.  To quote from the Camp article, “the development of aesthetic practices with individual providers are considered to be interchangeable and replaceable is becoming ever more prominent.”  This is particularly the case among the “medispas.” The practices are often named after a geographic location with the cachet of affluence such as Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills or La Jolla.  In these practices, or perhaps better described as “mills,” the practitioners are employees of the corporate owner of the clinical facility and are pushed to produce revenue.  The divorce of the practice from the name of a responsible physician has the potential to have a profound impact on the doctor-patient relationship and how patients select a provider.

Therefore, as the Romans said, “caveat emptor;” Let the buyer beware. This is especially true in California since there is essentially no enforcement by the medical board, which has recently been stripped of most of its funding.  Many complaints and many bodies must pile up before anything will be done.  Any doctor can do virtually anything in his office and will not be stopped until there are large numbers of complaints or he kills or maims a patient.  It is amazing that we require such tight restrictions on many other fields such as airline pilots.  What is happening is the equivalent of allowing someone who knows how to fly a single engine plane to go ahead and sit at the controls of 747, bringing it down for a landing into a major metropolitan area without any training.  Do you want the professional airline pilot with a complete education or someone who had a one-day course in the 747 before he takes your life into his hands? On the flip side, I am a trained plastic surgeon who has had thousands of hours of training and experience in plastic surgery but I have also had some training in many other aspects of medicine.  Legally, I can perform brain surgery and heart transplants in my own operating room, but would I be your best choice if you needed these procedures?  What if I were to offer to do the surgery at a discount?  …Yeah, I didn’t think so.

If you’re considering a plastic surgeon, do what the caterpillar did.  Ask, “who are you?”  “Are you board-certified?”  “Are you board-certified in plastic surgery?”  “How many of these procedures have you done?”  “How long have you been providing this procedure?”  “Do you have hospital privileges?  Or is plastic surgery just another way to boost your income.”  Or, “are you a cosmetic surgeon” which is essentially a meaningless term since there is no recognized Board of cosmetic surgery.

Caveat emptor. Do your homework and trust your gut feelings.  If you feel unsure or apprehensive, regardless of whom the person is, move on.  Plastic surgery is not like having your hair done.  Some people spend more time researching a vacation then researching a plastic surgeon, don’t be one of them.


Permalink to Local Anesthesia, General or Sedation for Plastic Surgery?

Local Anesthesia, General or Sedation for Plastic Surgery?

There seems to be a trend of late, judging by what is out on the Web and in advertising, to promote plastic surgery procedures under local anesthesia…  only… nothing else… stone cold sober.  Nothing to make you feel relaxed, to take the edge off, nothing to soften or eliminate the sights, the sounds,  and other physical and emotional reactions to having a plastic surgery procedure performed on your body.

Now, I do perform some plastic surgery procedures using local anesthesia pretty much every week.  A little scar revision, a facial contour in a small area, or a micro-liposuction on the face.  But most of the plastic surgery I perform at Advanced Concepts in Plastic Surgery in Sacramento are performed with sedation or with a general anesthetic.

First of all what is sedation? Sedation is when the patient has an IV and receives sedation medication through it but remains conscious.  There are several different kinds of drugs that put the patient in a particularly happy place.  This means you’re not completely asleep but you are also not aware of what’s going on, you are very comfortable and breathing without the help of a breathing machine.

So why would you not want to be aware of what is being done to you?  I’ll use myself as an example.  Several years ago I had a wisdom tooth erupt.  I guess I’m a late bloomer. I had it removed under local anesthesia only.  The dentist did a great job as I did not feel any pain.  But it was a very unpleasant experience with all the rasping, grinding and pulling.  In addition to that, my mouth and jaw was very sore from staying open.  So, how do you think I would have felt after two or three more just like that?  So let me state the case.  If I have to do that again, I just don’t want to know about it, and I assume my patients would rather not experience that kind of discomfort during their plastic surgery procedure either.

Where does strict local anesthesia work best?  Local anesthesia works in small areas and in a very limited short plastic surgery procedure.  When do you want sedation?  When doing a longer procedure with larger areas where they may still have feeling in spite of the local anesthesia, like scar tissue or when working under the muscle.  When you have a longer procedure it’s difficult to lay in one position for hours.  The local anesthesia may wear off and need to be freshened or it will become uncomfortable.  My goal for all my patients is to have everything as painless as possible on all levels.  When you do it under strict local anesthesia, there is always some amount of pain involved.

Another issue has to do with the regulations of surgery centers.  In California, if you do plastic surgery with sedation or general anesthetic, the facility has to be licensed by an agency that licenses surgery centers.  Currently there are two main ones AAAHC and AAAASF.  I actually do inspections for the latter.  When you pass inspection for unique standards of organization, cleanliness, accountability, and safety that means that your physical plant has been approved, it also means that you have hospital privileges for the procedure being done.  However if the procedures are under straight local anesthesia, you do not need to meet the strict standards of the physical plant or hygiene and safety accountability.

That certainly doesn’t mean that everyone promoting, “local anesthesia only procedures,” is doing it to avoid regulation of shoddy or dangerous conditions, but… let the buyer beware.

What about general anesthesia for plastic surgery procedures?  Even when using lots of local anesthesia some surgeries are very stimulating to the nervous system.  This is because local anesthesia blocks the pain stimulus but not necessarily pressure, pulling or heat.  One of the worst horror stories I’ve heard about local anesthesia revolve around a patient that had a breast augmentation under local anesthesia, with some sedation, and “woke up” in the middle of the procedure and was told to be still,” because we have to finish.”  They felt and  experienced much more than they wanted to.  Sometimes you need what is called muscle relaxation sedation to do what you need to do, i.e., put in a breast implant or suture up the abdominal muscles.  A light general anesthetic is perfect for a breast augmentation, mommy makeover or total facial rejuvenation such as a facelift because it keeps you perfectly comfortable for those longer procedures and often times actually requires less total medication and sedation.

In summary: straight local anesthesia is great for very small procedures. But IV sedation or   general anesthesia are better solutions for making the patient comfortable for many plastic surgery procedures.  My goal for the patients is a painless plastic surgery, and local anesthesia is not the best way to achieve  that in every case.


Permalink to Vaser Hi Def Liposuction, Top 10 Questions

Vaser Hi Def Liposuction, Top 10 Questions

Vaser Hi Def Liposuction is a plastic surgery procedure that I am proud to offer exclusively in Northern California. I am one of only two doctors trained in this unique body sculpting technique in all of California and I offer this unique hybrid of Vaser liposuction at Advanced Concepts in Plastic Surgery in Sacramento, CA.  There are many questions to be answered.  We will deal with the top 10 questions I get asked.

1. Vaser Hi Def – what is it? It is a completely new plastic surgery procedure.  Using Vaser technology in three dimensions: the chest, the back, the abdomen, arms and legs can be sculpted for the first time.  Despite claims that liposuction proponents have made, this is the first true liposculpture.  With liposuction in the past, the end result was the elimination of lumps and bulges, leaving a flat area where there used to be fat.  Now, with Vaser Hi Def, the true contour of your body can be brought out.  The Vaser probe selectively melts only fat unlike some other energy systems.  By differentially melting the fat in several different layers true sculpting can be achieved.
2. How much does Vaser Hi Def cost? Depending on the areas worked on this plastic surgery procedure costs from $7,000-$20,000.  It is roughly double the cost of regular liposuction.
3. Why is it so expensive?  Vaser Hi Def is expensive because of the very expensive equipment used, the extensive training and experience required to do it properly, and the time involved in the procedure itself, which is roughly twice as long as regular liposuction.  When you see the results it is actually very cost-effective.
4. Who is a candidate for Vaser Hi Def? The best candidates are men and women with a BMI (Body Mass Index) below 30.  This is not procedure for obese people or for people with very loose skin.  You are a candidate if you had six pack abs in the past and would like them back.  You are a candidate if you have spent hours at the gym for years and are making any progress in getting rid of abdominal fat.  You are a candidate if genetics, age and a lack of time are conspiring against you.  You are a candidate if you don’t want to take dangerous fat melting drugs or hormones that risk your health.  You are a candidate if you don’t want to spend all your free time exercising.
5. Will the effects last? The effects of Vaser Hi Def liposuction should last indefinitely assuming you maintain a reasonable weight.
6. What if I gain weight? If you gain weight, the effects should last through a 10 to 15 pound weight gain.  If you gain 30 or 40 pounds or more the effects will not stay and may even cause unsightly bulges.  It’s further motivation to stay in shape.
7. Will it hurt? Vaser Hi Def has some discomfort like any surgical procedure.  You will be given pain pills which will make your comfortable.  After a day or two most people are not taking pain medication.
8. How much time off work? Most people only need to be off work for seven to ten days.  After two to four weeks you can return to mild exercise.  After four weeks you can return to regular exercise.
9. Will any other treatment accomplished the same results? No.  Other treatments such as standard liposuction, Smart Lipo, Thermage, or abdominal etching will not achieve the same result as the three-dimensional process of Vaser Hi Def.
10. Where do I start? You start by making a consultation an appointment with me and have an evaluation and if you’re a candidate we can schedule your surgery.

Page 1 of 212

RSS Beauty Pyramid on Facebook

  • Love the Mirror Again! http://conta.cc/shkiPa December 21, 2011
    Love the Mirror Again! http://conta.cc/shkiPaLove the Mirror Again! Solutions for the Face & Neckevents.r20.constantcontact.comAs the new year begins, you may be wondering what new facial rejuvenation technologies are available to turn back time. Join Dr. Andrew Kaczynski and Dolce Vita Day Spa's registered nurse, Danielle Ward as well as other Muse […]

Do you have questions or need more information? Please contact us!

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Your Phone Number

Subject

Your Message

captcha

Enter the text string above and hit send.

Location Info

  • Andrew Kaczynski, MD

  • Advanced Concepts in Plastic Surgery
  • 77 Cadillac Drive
  • Sacramento, CA, 95825
  • or

  • 9719 Village Center Drive, Suite 110
  • Granite Bay, CA 95746
  • (916) 925-5522